Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
AI Mastery Index94.8
LMSYS Arena1472
Technical (MMLU-Pro)94.6%
Cost per 1M Tokens$2
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
AI Mastery Index93.5
LMSYS Arena1494
Technical (MMLU-Pro)93.2%
Cost per 1M Tokens$0.75

Which should you use?

Claude Sonnet 5 leads on the composite index by 1.3 points (94.8 vs 93.5).

Cost is the sharper difference: Claude Sonnet 5 is 2.7x the input price of Gemini 3.8 Flash ($2 against $0.75 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.

Pick Claude Sonnet 5 when

  • Higher composite index — 94.8 against 93.5, a gap of 1.3 points.
  • Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 94.6% against 93.2%.

Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash when

  • Ahead on Arena Elo by 22 points (1494 vs 1472), which is outside the board's published confidence intervals.
  • Cheaper input tokens — $0.75 against $2 per 1M, so Claude Sonnet 5 costs 2.7x as much to feed.
  • Better value per point of measured capability: $0.008 per index point against $0.021.

Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: Gemini 3.8 Flash $0.008 · Claude Sonnet 5 $0.021 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.

Our reporting on Anthropic and Google