Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
AI Mastery Index96.9
LMSYS Arena1504
Technical (MMLU-Pro)95.9%
Cost per 1M Tokens$10
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
AI Mastery Index95.7
LMSYS Arena1483
Technical (MMLU-Pro)95.1%
Cost per 1M Tokens$4

Which should you use?

Claude Fable 5.1 leads on the composite index by 1.2 points (96.9 vs 95.7).

Cost is the sharper difference: Claude Fable 5.1 is 2.5x the input price of GPT-5.6 Sol ($10 against $4 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.

Pick Claude Fable 5.1 when

  • Higher composite index — 96.9 against 95.7, a gap of 1.2 points.
  • Ahead on Arena Elo by 21 points (1504 vs 1483), which is outside the board's published confidence intervals.
  • Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 95.9% against 95.1%.

Pick GPT-5.6 Sol when

  • Cheaper input tokens — $4 against $10 per 1M, so Claude Fable 5.1 costs 2.5x as much to feed.
  • Better value per point of measured capability: $0.042 per index point against $0.103.

Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: GPT-5.6 Sol $0.042 · Claude Fable 5.1 $0.103 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.

Our reporting on Anthropic and OpenAI