Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
AI Mastery Index96.6
LMSYS Arena1493
Technical (MMLU-Pro)95.7%
Cost per 1M Tokens$5
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
AI Mastery Index93.5
LMSYS Arena1494
Technical (MMLU-Pro)93.2%
Cost per 1M Tokens$0.75

Which should you use?

Claude Opus 5 leads on the composite index by 3.1 points (96.6 vs 93.5).

Their Arena Elo differs by only 1 points, inside the confidence intervals the public board reports, so human preference does not separate them.

Cost is the sharper difference: Claude Opus 5 is 6.7x the input price of Gemini 3.8 Flash ($5 against $0.75 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.

Pick Claude Opus 5 when

  • Higher composite index — 96.6 against 93.5, a gap of 3.1 points.
  • Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 95.7% against 93.2%.

Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash when

  • Cheaper input tokens — $0.75 against $5 per 1M, so Claude Opus 5 costs 6.7x as much to feed.
  • Better value per point of measured capability: $0.008 per index point against $0.052.

Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: Gemini 3.8 Flash $0.008 · Claude Opus 5 $0.052 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.

Our reporting on Anthropic and Google