Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
AI Mastery Index96.6
LMSYS Arena1493
Technical (MMLU-Pro)95.7%
Cost per 1M Tokens$5
Muse Spark 1.1
Meta
AI Mastery Index92.3
LMSYS Arena1492
Technical (MMLU-Pro)91.9%
Cost per 1M Tokens$1.25

Which should you use?

Claude Opus 5 leads on the composite index by 4.3 points (96.6 vs 92.3).

Their Arena Elo differs by only 1 points, inside the confidence intervals the public board reports, so human preference does not separate them.

Cost is the sharper difference: Claude Opus 5 is 4x the input price of Muse Spark 1.1 ($5 against $1.25 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.

Pick Claude Opus 5 when

  • Higher composite index — 96.6 against 92.3, a gap of 4.3 points.
  • Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 95.7% against 91.9%.

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when

  • Cheaper input tokens — $1.25 against $5 per 1M, so Claude Opus 5 costs 4x as much to feed.
  • Better value per point of measured capability: $0.014 per index point against $0.052.

Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: Muse Spark 1.1 $0.014 · Claude Opus 5 $0.052 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.

Our reporting on Anthropic and Meta