GPT-5.6 Luna vs Claude Fable 5.1

Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
AI Mastery Index92
LMSYS Arena1455
Technical (MMLU-Pro)92%
Cost per 1M Tokens$0.2
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
AI Mastery Index96.9
LMSYS Arena1504
Technical (MMLU-Pro)95.9%
Cost per 1M Tokens$10

Which should you use?

Claude Fable 5.1 leads on the composite index by 4.9 points (92 vs 96.9).

Cost is the sharper difference: Claude Fable 5.1 is 50x the input price of GPT-5.6 Luna ($10 against $0.2 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.

Pick GPT-5.6 Luna when

  • Cheaper input tokens — $0.2 against $10 per 1M, so Claude Fable 5.1 costs 50x as much to feed.
  • Better value per point of measured capability: $0.002 per index point against $0.103.

Pick Claude Fable 5.1 when

  • Higher composite index — 96.9 against 92, a gap of 4.9 points.
  • Ahead on Arena Elo by 49 points (1504 vs 1455), which is outside the board's published confidence intervals.
  • Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 95.9% against 92%.

Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: GPT-5.6 Luna $0.002 · Claude Fable 5.1 $0.103 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.

Our reporting on OpenAI and Anthropic