GPT-5.6 Luna vs Claude Opus 5

Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
AI Mastery Index92
LMSYS Arena1455
Technical (MMLU-Pro)92%
Cost per 1M Tokens$0.2
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
AI Mastery Index96.6
LMSYS Arena1493
Technical (MMLU-Pro)95.7%
Cost per 1M Tokens$5

Which should you use?

Claude Opus 5 leads on the composite index by 4.6 points (92 vs 96.6).

Cost is the sharper difference: Claude Opus 5 is 25x the input price of GPT-5.6 Luna ($5 against $0.2 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.

Pick GPT-5.6 Luna when

  • Cheaper input tokens — $0.2 against $5 per 1M, so Claude Opus 5 costs 25x as much to feed.
  • Better value per point of measured capability: $0.002 per index point against $0.052.

Pick Claude Opus 5 when

  • Higher composite index — 96.6 against 92, a gap of 4.6 points.
  • Ahead on Arena Elo by 38 points (1493 vs 1455), which is outside the board's published confidence intervals.
  • Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 95.7% against 92%.

Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: GPT-5.6 Luna $0.002 · Claude Opus 5 $0.052 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.

Our reporting on OpenAI and Anthropic