GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Sonnet 5

Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
AI Mastery Index96.7
LMSYS Arena1496
Technical (MMLU-Pro)95.8%
Cost per 1M Tokens$10
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
AI Mastery Index94.8
LMSYS Arena1472
Technical (MMLU-Pro)94.6%
Cost per 1M Tokens$2

Which should you use?

GPT-6 Astra leads on the composite index by 1.9 points (96.7 vs 94.8).

Cost is the sharper difference: GPT-6 Astra is 5x the input price of Claude Sonnet 5 ($10 against $2 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.

Pick GPT-6 Astra when

  • Higher composite index — 96.7 against 94.8, a gap of 1.9 points.
  • Ahead on Arena Elo by 24 points (1496 vs 1472), which is outside the board's published confidence intervals.
  • Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 95.8% against 94.6%.

Pick Claude Sonnet 5 when

  • Cheaper input tokens — $2 against $10 per 1M, so GPT-6 Astra costs 5x as much to feed.
  • Better value per point of measured capability: $0.021 per index point against $0.103.

Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: Claude Sonnet 5 $0.021 · GPT-6 Astra $0.103 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.

Our reporting on OpenAI and Anthropic