GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Opus 5

Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
AI Mastery Index96.7
LMSYS Arena1496
Technical (MMLU-Pro)95.8%
Cost per 1M Tokens$10
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
AI Mastery Index96.6
LMSYS Arena1493
Technical (MMLU-Pro)95.7%
Cost per 1M Tokens$5

Which should you use?

GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5 score within 0.1 points of each other on the composite index, which is too close to call a winner on capability alone.

Their Arena Elo differs by only 3 points, inside the confidence intervals the public board reports, so human preference does not separate them.

Cost is the sharper difference: GPT-6 Astra is 2x the input price of Claude Opus 5 ($10 against $5 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.

Pick GPT-6 Astra when

  • Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 95.8% against 95.7%.

Pick Claude Opus 5 when

  • Cheaper input tokens — $5 against $10 per 1M, so GPT-6 Astra costs 2x as much to feed.
  • Better value per point of measured capability: $0.052 per index point against $0.103.

Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: Claude Opus 5 $0.052 · GPT-6 Astra $0.103 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.

Our reporting on OpenAI and Anthropic