Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude 4.7 Opus
Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.
Which should you use?
Claude Sonnet 5 supersedes Claude 4.7 Opus in Anthropic's line-up, so this is an upgrade question rather than a bake-off.
Claude Sonnet 5 is also cheaper — $2 against $5 per 1M input tokens — so staying on Claude 4.7 Opus costs more for less.
Cost is the sharper difference: Claude 4.7 Opus is 2.5x the input price of Claude Sonnet 5 ($5 against $2 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.
Pick Claude Sonnet 5 when
- Higher composite index — 94.8 against 93.8, a gap of 1 points.
- Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 94.6% against 93.8%.
- Cheaper input tokens — $2 against $5 per 1M, so Claude 4.7 Opus costs 2.5x as much to feed.
- Better value per point of measured capability: $0.021 per index point against $0.053.
Pick Claude 4.7 Opus when
- Ahead on Arena Elo by 22 points (1494 vs 1472), which is outside the board's published confidence intervals.
Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: Claude Sonnet 5 $0.021 · Claude 4.7 Opus $0.053 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.
Where these numbers come from
Figures as of 2026-09-14. Arena Elo and pricing are read from the public board and each vendor's own pricing page; see the full leaderboard for all 34 models and which columns are measured rather than estimated, or the benchmark matrix for scores benchmark by benchmark.
