Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude 4.7 Opus

Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
AI Mastery Index94.8
LMSYS Arena1472
Technical (MMLU-Pro)94.6%
Cost per 1M Tokens$2
Claude 4.7 Opus
Anthropic
AI Mastery Index93.8
LMSYS Arena1494
Technical (MMLU-Pro)93.8%
Cost per 1M Tokens$5

Which should you use?

Claude Sonnet 5 supersedes Claude 4.7 Opus in Anthropic's line-up, so this is an upgrade question rather than a bake-off.

Claude Sonnet 5 is also cheaper — $2 against $5 per 1M input tokens — so staying on Claude 4.7 Opus costs more for less.

Cost is the sharper difference: Claude 4.7 Opus is 2.5x the input price of Claude Sonnet 5 ($5 against $2 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.

Pick Claude Sonnet 5 when

  • Higher composite index — 94.8 against 93.8, a gap of 1 points.
  • Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 94.6% against 93.8%.
  • Cheaper input tokens — $2 against $5 per 1M, so Claude 4.7 Opus costs 2.5x as much to feed.
  • Better value per point of measured capability: $0.021 per index point against $0.053.

Pick Claude 4.7 Opus when

  • Ahead on Arena Elo by 22 points (1494 vs 1472), which is outside the board's published confidence intervals.

Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: Claude Sonnet 5 $0.021 · Claude 4.7 Opus $0.053 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.

Our reporting on Anthropic