Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8

Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
AI Mastery Index94.8
LMSYS Arena1472
Technical (MMLU-Pro)94.6%
Cost per 1M Tokens$2
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
AI Mastery Index94.6
LMSYS Arena1463
Technical (MMLU-Pro)94.5%
Cost per 1M Tokens$5

Which should you use?

Claude Sonnet 5 supersedes Claude Opus 4.8 in Anthropic's line-up, so this is an upgrade question rather than a bake-off.

Claude Sonnet 5 is also cheaper — $2 against $5 per 1M input tokens — so staying on Claude Opus 4.8 costs more for less.

Their Arena Elo differs by only 9 points, inside the confidence intervals the public board reports, so human preference does not separate them.

Cost is the sharper difference: Claude Opus 4.8 is 2.5x the input price of Claude Sonnet 5 ($5 against $2 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.

Pick Claude Sonnet 5 when

  • Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 94.6% against 94.5%.
  • Cheaper input tokens — $2 against $5 per 1M, so Claude Opus 4.8 costs 2.5x as much to feed.
  • Better value per point of measured capability: $0.021 per index point against $0.053.

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 when

On these measures Claude Opus 4.8 does not lead Claude Sonnet 5 anywhere, so pick it only for reasons outside this table — an existing integration, a region, or a contract.

Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: Claude Sonnet 5 $0.021 · Claude Opus 4.8 $0.053 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.

Our reporting on Anthropic