Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek-V4 Pro

Source-checked evaluation entries, evidence gaps and checked price quotes where available.

Claude Fable 5.1

Anthropic
Text Arena1503 ± 6

Claude Fable 5.1 (Max). Board 2026-10-20; checked 2026-10-22.

Composite / MMLU estimatesWithheld
Standard short-context input quote / 1M tokens$10

Anthropic pricing · checked 2026-10-22. Context tiers and cache-hit rates may differ.

DeepSeek-V4 Pro

DeepSeek
Text Arena1465 ± 7

DeepSeek-V4-Pro (High, 20260813). Board 2026-10-20; checked 2026-10-22.

Composite / MMLU estimatesWithheld
Peak input quote / 1M tokens$1.32

DeepSeek pricing · checked 2026-10-22. Context tiers and cache-hit rates may differ.

What the evidence supports

The recorded entries are Claude Fable 5.1 (Max) (1503 ± 6) and DeepSeek-V4-Pro (High, 20260813) (1465 ± 7).

Their point estimates differ by 38 points. The displayed ranges do not overlap; this is not a test of task-specific superiority or a guarantee about a different configuration.

The former composite, MMLU and cost-per-capability recommendations are withdrawn because their inputs included unsupported estimates. No upgrade or overall capability recommendation is made from those numbers.

In the selected standard short-context input quotes, DeepSeek-V4 Pro has the lower rate, by a ratio of 7.58 to one. DeepSeek uses peak pricing. This is input pricing only; it does not estimate a whole workload or establish account access.

Price quotes are from the selected provider registry checked 2026-10-22. Unverified legacy quotes are withheld. Use the token calculator for input, output, cache-hit and context-tier scenarios. Additional service charges and account-specific terms can change a bill. Missing pricing evidence does not mean free inference.

Reporting on Anthropic and DeepSeek