Claude Opus 5 vs Claude 4.7 Opus

Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
AI Mastery Index96.6
LMSYS Arena1493
Technical (MMLU-Pro)95.7%
Cost per 1M Tokens$5
Claude 4.7 Opus
Anthropic
AI Mastery Index93.8
LMSYS Arena1494
Technical (MMLU-Pro)93.8%
Cost per 1M Tokens$5

Which should you use?

Claude Opus 5 supersedes Claude 4.7 Opus in Anthropic's line-up, so this is an upgrade question rather than a bake-off.

Both bill at $5 per 1M input tokens, so there is no cost argument for staying.

Their Arena Elo differs by only 1 points, inside the confidence intervals the public board reports, so human preference does not separate them.

Pick Claude Opus 5 when

  • Higher composite index — 96.6 against 93.8, a gap of 2.8 points.
  • Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 95.7% against 93.8%.

Pick Claude 4.7 Opus when

On these measures Claude 4.7 Opus does not lead Claude Opus 5 anywhere, so pick it only for reasons outside this table — an existing integration, a region, or a contract.

Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: Claude Opus 5 $0.052 · Claude 4.7 Opus $0.053 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.

Our reporting on Anthropic