GPT-5.6 Luna vs DeepSeek-V4 Pro

Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
AI Mastery Index92
LMSYS Arena1455
Technical (MMLU-Pro)92%
Cost per 1M Tokens$0.2
DeepSeek-V4 Pro
DeepSeek
AI Mastery Index91.8
LMSYS Arena1449
Technical (MMLU-Pro)91.8%
Cost per 1M Tokens$0.435

Which should you use?

GPT-5.6 Luna and DeepSeek-V4 Pro score within 0.2 points of each other on the composite index, which is too close to call a winner on capability alone.

Their Arena Elo differs by only 6 points, inside the confidence intervals the public board reports, so human preference does not separate them.

Cost is the sharper difference: DeepSeek-V4 Pro is 2.2x the input price of GPT-5.6 Luna ($0.435 against $0.2 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.

Pick GPT-5.6 Luna when

  • Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 92% against 91.8%.
  • Cheaper input tokens — $0.2 against $0.435 per 1M, so DeepSeek-V4 Pro costs 2.2x as much to feed.
  • Better value per point of measured capability: $0.002 per index point against $0.005.

Pick DeepSeek-V4 Pro when

On these measures DeepSeek-V4 Pro does not lead GPT-5.6 Luna anywhere, so pick it only for reasons outside this table — an existing integration, a region, or a contract.

Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: GPT-5.6 Luna $0.002 · DeepSeek-V4 Pro $0.005 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.

Our reporting on OpenAI and DeepSeek