GPT-5.6 Luna vs Muse Spark 1.1

Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
AI Mastery Index92
LMSYS Arena1455
Technical (MMLU-Pro)92%
Cost per 1M Tokens$0.2
Muse Spark 1.1
Meta
AI Mastery Index92.3
LMSYS Arena1492
Technical (MMLU-Pro)91.9%
Cost per 1M Tokens$1.25

Which should you use?

GPT-5.6 Luna and Muse Spark 1.1 score within 0.3 points of each other on the composite index, which is too close to call a winner on capability alone.

Cost is the sharper difference: Muse Spark 1.1 is 6.3x the input price of GPT-5.6 Luna ($1.25 against $0.2 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.

Pick GPT-5.6 Luna when

  • Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 92% against 91.9%.
  • Cheaper input tokens — $0.2 against $1.25 per 1M, so Muse Spark 1.1 costs 6.3x as much to feed.
  • Better value per point of measured capability: $0.002 per index point against $0.014.

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when

  • Ahead on Arena Elo by 37 points (1492 vs 1455), which is outside the board's published confidence intervals.

Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: GPT-5.6 Luna $0.002 · Muse Spark 1.1 $0.014 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.

Our reporting on OpenAI and Meta