GPT-6 Astra vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.
Which should you use?
GPT-6 Astra leads on the composite index by 3.2 points (96.7 vs 93.5).
Their Arena Elo differs by only 2 points, inside the confidence intervals the public board reports, so human preference does not separate them.
Cost is the sharper difference: GPT-6 Astra is 13.3x the input price of Gemini 3.8 Flash ($10 against $0.75 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.
Pick GPT-6 Astra when
- Higher composite index — 96.7 against 93.5, a gap of 3.2 points.
- Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 95.8% against 93.2%.
Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash when
- Cheaper input tokens — $0.75 against $10 per 1M, so GPT-6 Astra costs 13.3x as much to feed.
- Better value per point of measured capability: $0.008 per index point against $0.103.
Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: Gemini 3.8 Flash $0.008 · GPT-6 Astra $0.103 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.
Where these numbers come from
Figures as of 2026-09-07. Arena Elo and pricing are read from the public board and each vendor's own pricing page; see the full leaderboard for all 34 models and which columns are measured rather than estimated, or the benchmark matrix for scores benchmark by benchmark.