GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Source-checked evaluation entries, evidence gaps and checked price quotes where available.

GPT-6 Astra

OpenAI
Text Arena1476 ± 6

GPT-6 Astra (Max). Board 2026-10-20; checked 2026-10-22.

Composite / MMLU estimatesWithheld
Standard short-context input quote / 1M tokens$10

OpenAI pricing · checked 2026-10-22. Context tiers and cache-hit rates may differ.

GPT-5.6 Sol

OpenAI
Text Arena1484 ± 4

GPT-5.6 Sol (xHigh). Board 2026-10-20; checked 2026-10-22.

Composite / MMLU estimatesWithheld
Standard short-context input quote / 1M tokens$4

OpenAI pricing · checked 2026-10-22. Context tiers and cache-hit rates may differ.

What the evidence supports

The recorded entries are GPT-6 Astra (Max) (1476 ± 6) and GPT-5.6 Sol (xHigh) (1484 ± 4).

Their point estimates differ by 8 points. The displayed ranges overlap; this is not a test of task-specific superiority or a guarantee about a different configuration.

The former composite, MMLU and cost-per-capability recommendations are withdrawn because their inputs included unsupported estimates. No upgrade or overall capability recommendation is made from those numbers.

In the selected standard short-context input quotes, GPT-5.6 Sol has the lower rate, by a ratio of 2.5 to one. DeepSeek uses peak pricing. This is input pricing only; it does not estimate a whole workload or establish account access.

Price quotes are from the selected provider registry checked 2026-10-22. Unverified legacy quotes are withheld. Use the token calculator for input, output, cache-hit and context-tier scenarios. Additional service charges and account-specific terms can change a bill. Missing pricing evidence does not mean free inference.

Reporting on OpenAI