Grok 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.1
Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.
Which should you use?
Grok 4.6 leads on the composite index by 1.5 points (93.8 vs 92.3).
Cost is the sharper difference: Grok 4.6 is 1.6x the input price of Muse Spark 1.1 ($2 against $1.25 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.
Pick Grok 4.6 when
- Higher composite index — 93.8 against 92.3, a gap of 1.5 points.
- Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 93.1% against 91.9%.
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when
- Ahead on Arena Elo by 22 points (1492 vs 1470), which is outside the board's published confidence intervals.
- Cheaper input tokens — $1.25 against $2 per 1M, so Grok 4.6 costs 1.6x as much to feed.
- Better value per point of measured capability: $0.014 per index point against $0.021.
Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: Muse Spark 1.1 $0.014 · Grok 4.6 $0.021 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.
Where these numbers come from
Figures as of 2026-09-07. Arena Elo and pricing are read from the public board and each vendor's own pricing page; see the full leaderboard for all 34 models and which columns are measured rather than estimated, or the benchmark matrix for scores benchmark by benchmark.