Muse Spark 1.1 vs DeepSeek-V4 Pro
Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.
Which should you use?
Muse Spark 1.1 and DeepSeek-V4 Pro score within 0.5 points of each other on the composite index, which is too close to call a winner on capability alone.
Cost is the sharper difference: Muse Spark 1.1 is 2.9x the input price of DeepSeek-V4 Pro ($1.25 against $0.435 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when
- Ahead on Arena Elo by 43 points (1492 vs 1449), which is outside the board's published confidence intervals.
- Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 91.9% against 91.8%.
Pick DeepSeek-V4 Pro when
- Cheaper input tokens — $0.435 against $1.25 per 1M, so Muse Spark 1.1 costs 2.9x as much to feed.
- Better value per point of measured capability: $0.005 per index point against $0.014.
Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: DeepSeek-V4 Pro $0.005 · Muse Spark 1.1 $0.014 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.
Where these numbers come from
Figures as of 2026-09-14. Arena Elo and pricing are read from the public board and each vendor's own pricing page; see the full leaderboard for all 34 models and which columns are measured rather than estimated, or the benchmark matrix for scores benchmark by benchmark.
