Muse Spark 1.1 vs DeepSeek-V4 Pro

Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.

Muse Spark 1.1
Meta
AI Mastery Index92.3
LMSYS Arena1492
Technical (MMLU-Pro)91.9%
Cost per 1M Tokens$1.25
DeepSeek-V4 Pro
DeepSeek
AI Mastery Index91.8
LMSYS Arena1449
Technical (MMLU-Pro)91.8%
Cost per 1M Tokens$0.435

Which should you use?

Muse Spark 1.1 and DeepSeek-V4 Pro score within 0.5 points of each other on the composite index, which is too close to call a winner on capability alone.

Cost is the sharper difference: Muse Spark 1.1 is 2.9x the input price of DeepSeek-V4 Pro ($1.25 against $0.435 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when

  • Ahead on Arena Elo by 43 points (1492 vs 1449), which is outside the board's published confidence intervals.
  • Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 91.9% against 91.8%.

Pick DeepSeek-V4 Pro when

  • Cheaper input tokens — $0.435 against $1.25 per 1M, so Muse Spark 1.1 costs 2.9x as much to feed.
  • Better value per point of measured capability: $0.005 per index point against $0.014.

Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: DeepSeek-V4 Pro $0.005 · Muse Spark 1.1 $0.014 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.

Our reporting on Meta and DeepSeek