Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8

Head-to-head technical comparison of intelligence, capabilities, and API pricing.

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
AI Mastery Index96.4
LMSYS Arena1507
Technical (MMLU-Pro)95.6%
Cost per 1M Tokens$10
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
AI Mastery Index94.6
LMSYS Arena1463
Technical (MMLU-Pro)94.5%
Cost per 1M Tokens$5

Which should you use?

Claude Fable 5 supersedes Claude Opus 4.8 in Anthropic's line-up, so this is an upgrade question rather than a bake-off.

Claude Fable 5 costs more ($10 against $5 per 1M input), so the upgrade is worth it only where the extra capability changes your output.

Cost is the sharper difference: Claude Fable 5 is 2x the input price of Claude Opus 4.8 ($10 against $5 per 1M), so at volume the choice is usually decided by budget rather than benchmarks.

Pick Claude Fable 5 when

  • Higher composite index — 96.4 against 94.6, a gap of 1.8 points.
  • Ahead on Arena Elo by 44 points (1507 vs 1463), which is outside the board's published confidence intervals.
  • Stronger on MMLU-Pro: 95.6% against 94.5%.

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 when

  • Cheaper input tokens — $5 against $10 per 1M, so Claude Fable 5 costs 2x as much to feed.
  • Better value per point of measured capability: $0.053 per index point against $0.104.

Value per point of measured capability, at list input pricing: Claude Opus 4.8 $0.053 · Claude Fable 5 $0.104 per index point. Run your own token mix through the token cost calculator — a comparison at list price ignores caching and batch discounts, which move real bills more than this gap does.

Our reporting on Anthropic